Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25959 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2011 13:52:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2011 13:52:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 30023 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2011 13:52:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 29791 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2011 13:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list river-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 29182 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2011 13:52:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:52:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.163.196.105] (HELO nyx.xs4all.nl) (83.163.196.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:52:45 +0000 Received: from saturn.qcg.lan ([192.168.99.10]) by nyx.xs4all.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PcIAY-0007SH-3q for river-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:52:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4D2B0F15.1070002@qcg.nl> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:52:21 +0100 From: Sim IJskes - QCG Organization: Quality Consultancy Group b.v. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: add extra call to ServiceStarter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Anybody objects adding an extra static method to ServiceStarter that instead of a args array, takes a reference to a Configuration instance? As well as refactoring the duplication caused by this, into a separate method that take a configuration and returns a Result? Gr. Sim -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397