river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Creswell <dan.cresw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Class EmbeddedNonActivatableServiceDescriptor
Date Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:31:36 GMT
Embedded feels like the wrong name as I could easily imagine having
non-embedded services taking a reference to a config directly purely because
of "neatness".

Almost feels like that constructor has wider utility than merely
embedding....

On 10 January 2011 16:23, Sim IJskes - QCG <sim@qcg.nl> wrote:

> Any objections to adding a EmbeddedNonActivatableServiceDescriptor modeled
> like NonActivatableServiceDescriptor but looking for the constructor
> signature:
>
> <impl>(Configuration config, LifeCycle lc)
>
> Gr. Sim
>
> --
> QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
> Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message