river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Creswell <dan.cresw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Class EmbeddedNonActivatableServiceDescriptor
Date Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:41:45 GMT
K so the bit I most care about is not tying this constructor to Embedded
alone so how about we compromise:

Create EmbeddedDescriptor as you plan and then add a backlog item to update
other descriptors to optionally exploit this new constructor as well.

?

On 10 January 2011 16:35, Sim IJskes - QCG <sim@qcg.nl> wrote:

> On 10-01-11 17:31, Dan Creswell wrote:
>
>> Embedded feels like the wrong name as I could easily imagine having
>> non-embedded services taking a reference to a config directly purely
>> because
>> of "neatness".
>>
>
> I agree, but i couldn't come up with a better one. Proposal?
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message