Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dan.creswell@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=kgiPjW+s1dhFA7KofAmpmWLe7q+lPMizufB+vnZshGIPHnHHOjUErwhQvnCGNWyb2n
         qHJVCMLitu2HwPVRrghRGavXuTpSPGo3rUncp527fO7XEr0D3jChgx1439ZscZzAugeg
         P2lxVb61ukiprGdTUxfnYcyiHJduVmYG5uqrY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4D126D88.2040704@acm.org>
References: <1293009549.81923193@192.168.2.228>
	<AANLkTi=xPCtAT9R-_-p0g6a8X6nB9y+XYAUPrbGaDneM@mail.gmail.com>
	<1293044231.999312361@192.168.2.228>
	<4D124CB9.8000508@acm.org>
	<AANLkTik6av+wNfts-DeSuK=39CK94mjfmytztdws-KOS@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D1264CB.3000407@acm.org>
	<AANLkTi=3krArL+dS=WfurjwHcZn0iJcwKHORu-JDM3Ff@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D126AB8.8020008@acm.org>
	<4D126D88.2040704@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:44:58 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTim6JoFpLo6zcCE3gNmn49OZcOURLohMcymj2GnP@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Space/outrigger suggestions (remote iterator vs. collection)
From: Dan Creswell <dan.creswell@gmail.com>
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb524207e07049806aafd

--0015175cb524207e07049806aafd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Two favourite libraries:

http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/

http://jackson.codehaus.org/


On 22 December 2010 21:28, Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> wrote:

> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
>> On 12/22/2010 1:02 PM, Dan Creswell wrote:
>>
> ...
>
>  What I would say is that if I were to do such a thing I'd be tempted more
>>> by
>>> JSON which is often a little less verbose than XML for many things and
>>> has
>>> plenty of libraries for parsing etc in almost any language. And the other
>>> thing I'd say is that if you're doing the work and prefer XML, you should
>>> get ultimate choice.
>>>
>>
>> I know nothing about JSON, so I can't say I have an informed preference.
>> I'll take a look at it. I'm always willing to learn.
>>
>
> I've taken a quick look, and it does seem to have the things I like about
> XML, such as nested objects, in a simpler, less verbose, form.
>
> Can you recommend a specific Java library for generating and parsing JSON?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Patricia
>

--0015175cb524207e07049806aafd--