Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12186 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2010 04:34:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Dec 2010 04:34:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 35222 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2010 04:34:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35089 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2010 04:34:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list river-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35081 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2010 04:34:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:34:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 209.147.113.130 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mmcgrady@topiatechnology.com) Received: from [209.147.113.130] (HELO zimbra.topiatechnology.com) (209.147.113.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:34:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.topiatechnology.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5B920906A8; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from zimbra.topiatechnology.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.topiatechnology.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zs8s4e6djaIc; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:33:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c-71-197-172-71.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.197.172.71]) by zimbra.topiatechnology.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1762090143; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:33:53 -0800 (PST) References: <862502422.8331290517859184.JavaMail.hudson@aegis> <112459958.8391290520715806.JavaMail.hudson@aegis> <4CEBDFC0.90506@qcg.nl> <4CEBE8B0.2020806@qcg.nl> <4CEBED3F.3080504@acm.org> <77F1E32F67C8D5479858C0C7E93EB46503E19BB8@WAL-MAIL.global.avidww.com> <4CEC61DA.3030702@zeus.net.au> <4CECC1A5.7070804@qcg.nl> <4CED1D08.3030101@acm.org> <4CED23EA.1020208@qcg.nl> <4CF6688A.7070201@wonderly.org> <4CF685DA.3080000@acm.org> <4CF6D8B8.6090006@zeus.net.au> <4CF6E337.4050402@acm.org> <4CF6F077.7030704@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <4CF6F077.7030704@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <84380CFD-746A-4F3C-9F53-E1B2493CF71F@topiatechnology.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "river-dev@incubator.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148a) From: Mike McGrady Subject: Re: JVM version policy Was: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-jdk1.5 #3 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:33:50 -0800 To: "river-dev@incubator.apache.org" Like I said, Java 1.6 is incompatible with Java RTS and that os very serious= in my neighborhood. We do QoS with Java RTS. Sent from my iPhone Michael McGrady Principal investigator AF081_028 SBIR Chief Architect Topia Technology, Inc Work 1.253.572.9712 Cel 1.253.720.3365 On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 12/1/2010 4:53 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote: > ... >> Some of the discussion has referenced Java CDC on BlueRay. Should >> these platforms have an overriding influence on whether River moves >> forward and adopts 1.6 as a baseline? I'm not so sure at this point. >=20 > Is the relevant Java dialect identical to 1.4? If not, we would need a sep= arate project to make portions of River run on it. >=20 > Patricia