Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44184 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2010 20:49:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Dec 2010 20:49:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 40832 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2010 20:49:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 40753 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2010 20:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list river-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 40745 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2010 20:49:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:49:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dennis.reedy@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.47] (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:49:13 +0000 Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so9441995qwg.6 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:48:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=qOVowwZDkwQSKzSQWlbK0fMziElk+7nYEbBglpxWOmY=; b=d2OpzpLQIt91qvv86gY8WhB8NGExZbs6LWNsQqAn/CRONgnTztj3DSqsCF2nXCdrj/ OBDRbKz4A+TadssGaDyfZljEGUNNAew684dUx13ISI8dS7Yd4gmUDd5j1vEcfM6b+7ac 3yarmtkeE2TeZ5Gkw6kW/4SL4bWtF7rE0rvv0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=s657O19KgQto9KslMZHmEsNImJmxJPNBFeGitNnKnts3N3UZq5atf8cEASTOj0IEF7 uXTwA4eGe/WW8IfuO30IwHAH7Wd2PvK2QXuOmWRXjK3aNALvB2+8BEE5PJPLIHf0oer4 ON4k3398AHOTu3llX3uSkwlIEiooxDgE4ZGT0= Received: by 10.229.215.76 with SMTP id hd12mr2771630qcb.197.1291495732644; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:48:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c-69-255-104-205.hsd1.va.comcast.net [69.255.104.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k15sm2269807qcu.11.2010.12.04.12.48.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:48:51 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: JVM version policy Was: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-jdk1.5 #3 From: Dennis Reedy In-Reply-To: <9D52DEA0-B5E1-4DF1-8E33-D01CE2344A00@topiatechnology.com> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 15:48:49 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3376041A-80D1-4C51-B525-170014726729@gmail.com> References: <862502422.8331290517859184.JavaMail.hudson@aegis> <4CEBDFC0.90506@qcg.nl> <4CEBE8B0.2020806@qcg.nl> <4CEBED3F.3080504@acm.org> <77F1E32F67C8D5479858C0C7E93EB46503E19BB8@WAL-MAIL.global.avidww.com> <4CEC61DA.3030702@zeus.net.au> <4CECC1A5.7070804@qcg.nl> <4CED1D08.3030101@acm.org> <4CED23EA.1020208@qcg.nl> <4CF6688A.7070201@wonderly.org> <4CF685DA.3080000@acm.org> <4CF6D8B8.6090006@zeus.net.au> <4CF6E337.4050402@acm.org> <4CF6F077.7030704@acm.org> <84380CFD-746A-4F3C-9F53-E1B2493CF71F@topiatechnology.com> <1291266017.16266.3373.camel@cameron> <75124B2C-1116-4A35-A186-FDA769E0BC52@topiatechnology.com> <4CF88A67.5000606@zeus.net.au> <4CF8932A.3030401@zeus.net.au> <4CF89E67.3080407@acm.org> <1A3CC0B1-CC23-459D-9274-2FAB74DEB662@topiatechnology.com> <4 CF9AB64.3070609@zeus.net.au> <9D52DEA0-B5E1-4DF1-8E33-D01CE2344A00@topiatechnology.com> To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 4, 2010, at 1024AM, Mike McGrady wrote: > We cannot throw our functionality into a client. We are resident in = the space. I dont understand what you mean by "resident in the space". You move = things through a JavaSpace, you dont execute things in a JavaSpace. Most = likely I think you are mixing having a service in the same JVM as a = JavaSpace (i.e. in a JVM that is hosting multiple services), as opposed = to resident in the space.