river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From tras...@trasuk.com
Subject Re: river.jar
Date Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:18:16 GMT
Isn't that already jsk-platform.jar?  I would object to anything that subverts the dynamic
proxy loading concept that is central to Jini. 

It is imperative that people don't, for instance, get the service-registrar proxy impls in
their local class path.  That would break compatibility with future or alternate impls.

Cheers,
Greg
------Original Message------
From: Sim IJskes - QCG
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
ReplyTo: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: river.jar
Sent: Dec 31, 2010 10:07 AM

Hello,

anybody have an objection against a river.jar in the build that contains 
all river runtime classes?

Gr. Sim

-- 
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397


Sent from my “contract free” BlackBerry® smartphone on the WIND network.
Mime
View raw message