river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sim IJskes - QCG <...@qcg.nl>
Subject Re: datastructure classes
Date Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:44:58 GMT
On 12/16/2010 09:48 PM, MICHAEL MCGRADY wrote:
> mean we do not do databases.  Of course we do.  Doesn't everyone?
> However, the primary data model and structures have to be in-memory
> because we cannot tolerate the time database calls take (in-memory is
> approximately 10,000 times faster).  I think that this is not only a

Is it, that you assume, that we would convert a in-memory based system 
into a db-only system? Would a persistence interface hook, add so much 
processing, that you can say in advance that you will not use it?

Is it, that you say, don't touch the implementation of Entry, or i will 
not use it?

Gr. Sim

Mime
View raw message