river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au>
Subject Re: JVM version policy Was: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-jdk1.5 #3
Date Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:26:57 GMT
Dennis Reedy wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2010, at 127PM, MICHAEL MCGRADY wrote:
>
>   
>> Perhaps this will help: on the generic question of going to Java 1.6, and my plea
not to do it.
>>
>> http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/33475
>>     
>
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for the link. You may also find more information here: http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/realtime/faq.jsp
>
> One thing on this topic that I am curious about is what Oracle's plan is for RTJ. We
certainly cant answer that in this forum. But... will they keep it? If so, and if they are
given a large enough business opportunity for it's use, will they move towards supporting
1.6? While this is a very interesting and compelling technical use of River, is it enough
to prohibit River moving to 1.6 and beyond?
>
> Just asking ...
>
> Regards
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
>   

I Spoke to Greg Bollella over the phone about this some time ago, Oracle 
was quite keen on it, capable of generating lots of data see and well, 
Oracle have this database...

Mime
View raw message