river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike McGrady <mmcgr...@topiatechnology.com>
Subject Re: datastructure classes
Date Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:19:05 GMT
++ this is so important.  The days of read mostly are gone.  

Sent from my iPhone

Michael McGrady
Principal investigator AF081_028 SBIR
Chief Architect
Topia Technology, Inc
Work 1.253.572.9712
Cel 1.253.720.3365

On Dec 14, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> wrote:

> Carfield Yim wrote:
>> Hi, copyonwritearraylist is suitable for this case imho. But it don't sound
>> like an option to you. Would you share a bit more. I am interest to learn
>> about it.
> My first feeling was that there is at least one workload that seems
> plausible to me for which it would have poor performance.
> The workload is one in which most transactions are either a write or a
> read-and-take. For example, consider a space that is the task pool for a
> distributed workload. The writers are discovering tasks that need doing,
> and recording them in the space. Each reader looks for a task it can do,
> takes it from the space, and performs it. Now suppose the space is
> buffering between bursty task creation and a fixed service rate.
> At times, the queue will get long, because of a burst of new tasks being
> added. Once that happens, copy-on-write becomes expensive.
> Could people with more JavaSpaces experience comment on the plausibility
> of this pattern?
> I believe JavaSpace needs to be treated as an infrastructure that needs
> robust performance across a wide range of workloads, not just
> optimization to make one workload run fast. However, I am tempted to
> implement a CopyOnWriteArrayList version, and say that any other
> implementation must beat it on at least one benchmark.
> Patricia

View raw message