river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jgr...@simulexinc.com
Subject Re: light refactoring
Date Wed, 29 Dec 2010 18:34:43 GMT
My understanding was that we had decided to require Java 5 or 6 for servers (owing mostly to
the concurrent packages), though the client-side requirements were left unresolved.   I thought
Java 5+ items were being used in the ongoing FastList refactor.

If I was mistaken, obviously some of what I did was invalid.


-----Original Message-----
From: "Niclas Hedhman" <niclas@hedhman.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:49am
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: light refactoring

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:37 PM,  <jgrahn@simulexinc.com> wrote:

> Replacing iterator usage with the enhanced for loop (for each).
> Added generic usage to internal methods/fields.  (Internal use appeared to be non-controversial,
and might ease future development.)
> Removed unused imports.

I am curious; Has there been a "move to Java 5" decision already??

Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

View raw message