Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1616 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2010 07:41:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Nov 2010 07:41:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 72887 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 07:41:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72591 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 07:41:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list river-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72575 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 07:41:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:41:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.163.196.105] (HELO nyx.xs4all.nl) (83.163.196.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:41:30 +0000 Received: from redstone.qcg.lan ([192.168.99.6]) by nyx.xs4all.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKR1O-00018h-VO; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:41:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4CEA1E93.4040705@qcg.nl> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:41:07 +0100 From: Sim IJskes - QCG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: builds@apache.org CC: "Gav..." , river-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66 References: <4CE90C70.3010102@qcg.nl> <009c01cb89dd$229307f0$67b917d0$@com.au> In-Reply-To: <009c01cb89dd$229307f0$67b917d0$@com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Great! I've started our freebsd job immediately. Gr. Sim On 11/22/2010 01:35 AM, Gav... wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sim IJskes - QCG [mailto:sim@qcg.nl] >> Sent: Sunday, 21 November 2010 10:11 PM >> To: builds@apache.org >> Cc: river-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Fwd: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66 >> >> Zsolt made the following remarks about our (failing) qa-build on >> freebsd. >> >> Is it possible to get an extra jdk on the freebsd1 instance in the line >> of the suggestions of Zsolt? > > installed in /usr/local/diablo-jdk16/ > > (though the other is still default) > > Most of our jails, including this Hudson one are currently FreeBSD 8.1 64 > bit. > > HTH > > Gav... > >> >> Gr. Sim >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66 >> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:55:26 +0100 >> From: Zsolt K�ti >> Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org >> To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org >> >> Hello Sim, >> >> Nice to hear FreeBSD is among the tested systems! >> >> That jdk (1.6.0_03-p4) is rather old an unmaintained. Either >> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_11 or current openJdk6 is suggested for use. >> Further things to consider which FreeBSD version (8.1 is the >> actual release) and on what platform (32 or 64 bit). I do not know how >> they are decided on. Could we have some voice in influencing them >> I would vote for 8.1/32bit (and add 64 bit version if possible). >> >> Thanks! >> Zsolt > >