Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79872 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2010 08:47:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Nov 2010 08:47:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 12576 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2010 08:47:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12474 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2010 08:47:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list river-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12466 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2010 08:47:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:47:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.163.196.105] (HELO nyx.xs4all.nl) (83.163.196.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:47:28 +0000 Received: from redstone.qcg.lan ([192.168.99.6]) by nyx.xs4all.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJj69-0008Tw-42 for river-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:47:05 +0100 Message-ID: <4CE78B08.9000005@qcg.nl> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:47:04 +0100 From: Sim IJskes - QCG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: ant run-tests does too much References: <4CE6F165.1070104@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <4CE6F165.1070104@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/19/2010 10:51 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I'm having a problem with "ant run-tests" doing too much, and taking too > long to get to the test in question. > > Even when run immediately after an all.build, so that all jars are up to > date, it goes through a lot of deleting and build jars. > > Can anything be done about this? Is there some alternative target I can > use that does not force rebuilding? Quick running of a single test is > very important for debug. I'm assuming you work with the latest version. Do you want to keep running a single test in a loop? Thats the only reason i can think of where you wouldn't like to build the harness-runtime and underlying river-runtime. If you are in a hurry, just remove the harness dependency in the run-tests target. Shall i include a target run-tests-nodep? Gr. Sim