river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org>
Subject JVM version policy Was: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-jdk1.5 #3
Date Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:35:11 GMT
Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
> In order to make a decision/think of a fix i need a clear version 
> support policy. Not something i need to trawl the mailing list archives 
> for. Anybody else having the same opinion?

+1 on the need for a clear version support policy without depending on 
trawling the mailing list archives. We should discuss and vote on a 
policy, and then document it on the web site.

I am strongly opposed to attempting to support any version that we do 
not routinely regression test. In practice, that means supporting at 
most two releases. If we think we can handle two, I suggest 1.5 and 1.6. 
If not, I think 1.6 only.


View raw message