river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sim IJskes - QCG <...@qcg.nl>
Subject Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA-windows #7
Date Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:44:43 GMT
On 11/22/2010 05:39 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> I think I understand what you are saying, but I'm not 100% sure, so I'm
> going to repeat back the message I'm getting:
> The implementation of SharedActivationPolicyPermission depends on
> FilePermission. Its Javadoc comment requires a policy string argument
> that conforms to the FilePermission policy string semantics.
> A URL, in general, is not a valid FilePermission policy string. On the
> other hand, a File path is. Incidentally, I've tested handling of the
> FilePermission wildcards in the File class, and it all works.
> File can do the "/" conversion correctly and automatically for the
> system on which it is run. Doing the conversion on the file path portion
> of the URL makes the test case I've been working on pass on both Windows
> and Ubuntu.
> Even if we make no change in the actual interface,
> SharedActivationPolicyPermission should enforce its stated requirement
> that the policy string constructor argument conform to FilePermssion
> policy semantics.

Yes! RST 559!

View raw message