river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zsolt Kúti <la.ti...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66
Date Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:55:26 GMT
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:33:00 +0100
Sim IJskes - QCG <sim@qcg.nl> wrote:

> On 11/21/2010 12:26 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
> >       [java] # of tests started   = 1410
> >       [java] # of tests completed = 1410
> >       [java] # of tests skipped   = 46
> >       [java] # of tests passed    = 1335
> >       [java] # of tests failed    = 75
> >       [java]
> > collect-result:
> >       [copy] Copying 1 file
> > to /usr<https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/River-trunk-QA/ws/jtsk/trunk/qa/result>
> > [copy] Copying 1 file
> > to /usr<https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/River-trunk-QA/ws/jtsk/trunk/qa/result>
> > [zip] Building
> > zip: /usr<https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/River-trunk-QA/66/artifact/jtsk/trunk/qa/result/qaresults-amd64-FreeBSD-1.6.0_03-p4.zip>
> 
> I guess freebsd is not without its problems. yet. I've seen some disk 
> problems reported by others on freebsd1 even jvm crashes.
> 

Hello Sim,

Nice to hear FreeBSD is among the tested systems!

That jdk (1.6.0_03-p4) is rather old an unmaintained. Either
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_11 or current openJdk6 is suggested for use.
Further things to consider which FreeBSD version (8.1 is the
actual release) and on what platform (32 or 64 bit). I do not know how
they are decided on. Could we have some voice in influencing them
I would vote for 8.1/32bit (and add 64 bit version if possible).

Thanks!
Zsolt

Mime
View raw message