Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15483 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 11:29:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 11:29:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 39511 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 11:29:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39398 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 11:29:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list river-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39390 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 11:29:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:29:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.163.196.105] (HELO nyx.xs4all.nl) (83.163.196.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:28:58 +0000 Received: from saturn.qcg.lan ([192.168.99.10]) by nyx.xs4all.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P6Lz9-00018Q-Ag for river-dev@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:28:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4CB6E962.6030209@qcg.nl> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:28:34 +0200 From: Sim IJskes - QCG Organization: Quality Consultancy Group b.v. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Java package names References: <77F1E32F67C8D5479858C0C7E93EB465030A825A@WAL-MAIL.global.avidww.com> <4CB4CADD.6050200@acm.org> <77F1E32F67C8D5479858C0C7E93EB465031270C2@WAL-MAIL.global.avidww.com> <4CB6DC86.6030801@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <4CB6DC86.6030801@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14-10-10 12:33, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > Do any of your unit tests test the Jini implementation, independent of > the rest of your own code? If so, please consider contributing them, so > that they can be run as part of the build tests. The more unit tests, > from the more different sources, the better. > > One way of minimizing pain during a package reorganization would be to > go through a step of having both old and new versions of the classes, > with the old versions unmodified except for being deprecated. Code using > the classes could be modified gradually to remove references to > deprecated classes. Some remarks: * a.Thing.class != b.Thing.class * discipline to maintain svn revision history * extend and deprecate? final classes? I prefer big bang conversion. Gr. Sim -- QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397