river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Costers <jonathan.cost...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Request for testing help
Date Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:39:38 GMT
That was my observation as well.
I think the txnmanager spec may shed some light?
The original Jini specs are included in the doc folder.

2010/10/14 Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>

> On 10/14/2010 12:55 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>> Jonathan Costers wrote:
>>> The complete current QA test suite passed with this change included.
>>> Also, I ran the "txnmanager" category, all tests pass except
>>> GetStateTest.td
>>> (which hangs), but this one was already behaving that way without this
>>> fix.
>>> I'd say commit it.
>>> PS: if anyone would be able to debug GetStateTest and figure out what is
>>> wrong with it, we could add another 40-something tests (covering
>>> mahalo impl
>>> and the transactionmanager spec) to our QA run on Hudson (txnmanager
>>> category).
>> I'm back from my vacation, and ready to resume River activities. I'll
>> take a look at GetStateTest.td, unless there is something more urgent.
> I have a specification question. Is a TransactionManager *required* to
> forget a transaction within some amount of time after it has been aborted?
> The test hangs because it is waiting for getState to throw an exception,
> rather than going on reporting state 6, TransactionConstants.ABORTED.
> Patricia

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message