river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org>
Subject Re: Request for testing help
Date Fri, 15 Oct 2010 03:44:27 GMT
On 10/14/2010 12:55 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> Jonathan Costers wrote:
>> The complete current QA test suite passed with this change included.
>> Also, I ran the "txnmanager" category, all tests pass except
>> GetStateTest.td
>> (which hangs), but this one was already behaving that way without this
>> fix.
>> I'd say commit it.
>> PS: if anyone would be able to debug GetStateTest and figure out what is
>> wrong with it, we could add another 40-something tests (covering
>> mahalo impl
>> and the transactionmanager spec) to our QA run on Hudson (txnmanager
>> category).
> I'm back from my vacation, and ready to resume River activities. I'll
> take a look at GetStateTest.td, unless there is something more urgent.

I have a specification question. Is a TransactionManager *required* to 
forget a transaction within some amount of time after it has been aborted?

The test hangs because it is waiting for getState to throw an exception, 
rather than going on reporting state 6, TransactionConstants.ABORTED.


View raw message