river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sim IJskes - QCG <...@qcg.nl>
Subject Re: Towards Internet Jini Services (trust)
Date Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:00:59 GMT
On 10/05/2010 03:48 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:

> Just curious here, what if the decision was that you can only load
> classes locally? That in order to get your classes you had to first
> download the jars from a (trusted) server (perhaps even prompting the
> user to accept the download?). You would verify the authenticity of
> those jars before creating a classloader to load the required
> classes. If you already have the jars (locally) necessary, why
> download them again?

That would be my preferred way of security, matching practices already 
there. Signed jars, downloaded with webstart, and communicating over jini.

> Consider you already have the service's interface (and any other
> supporting classes) in your classpath to begin with (which is loaded
> locally), why not provision the remote service's proxy jars first
> before connecting to the service? Appropriate handshaking happens to
> connect to the remote service of course, but do you take the dynamic
> insecure class loading out of the equation this way?


But i got the feeling that others within the river community still want 
to maintain the same 'code agility', as deployment on a lan.

Gr. Sim

View raw message