river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michal Kleczek <michal.klec...@xpro.biz>
Subject Re: PGP
Date Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:25:31 GMT
On Tuesday 12 of October 2010 16:13:14 Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 04:10 PM, Michal Kleczek wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 of October 2010 16:04:41 Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
> >> On 10/12/2010 03:39 PM, Michal Kleczek wrote:
> >>> Or your code is signed with PGP - but I don't have a PGP verifier
> >>> installed. Is it possible for you to provide me with third party PGP
> >>> verifier code that in turn is signed with a standard X509 certificate?
> >> 
> >> Why PGP? The PKI is the same. The CA's signing domain related
> >> certificates are creating the inflexibility.
> > 
> > Exactly... Hierarchical CAs are inflexible - that's why PGP (or SPKI) :)
> 
> Strange reasoning. I'm my own CA. Whats the problem?

Your CA certificate is self-signed. How can I trust it?
Is it possible o build a chain of trust like in SPKI?

Michal

Mime
View raw message