river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org>
Subject Re: ServiceDiscoveryManager test coverage
Date Sun, 22 Aug 2010 02:59:48 GMT
The 2.1.2 run has got through all the servicediscovery tests without any 
failures, so that seems to be the starting point.

I may try a binary search - pick a version half way between 2.1.2 and 
the latest, test that one ....

Patricia


On 8/21/2010 6:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> I've checked out branches/2.1.2 and started a test, with
> servicediscovery added to its qa.run target. I'll let you know what
> happens.
>
> Patricia
>
>
> On 8/21/2010 6:00 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>> I'm probably not going to find time to run the tests for about a week,
>> however we should probably start back at the last release and confirm
>> that runs as expected first.
>>
>> Peter Firmstone wrote:
>>> I'm aware that some of the tests that aren't being run are known
>>> failures due to the missing Kerberos Key Server and Squid Proxy
>>> server. I had one zone set up on apache zones for the KDC, however I
>>> haven't set that up. I'm not sure if the same zone can be used for the
>>> Kerberos Key server and the Proxy, or if we need a new proxy server
>>> zone too.
>>>
>>> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>>> On 8/21/2010 3:43 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>> This is unfortunate, to solve it, I'll to have to go back in time &
>>>>> find
>>>>> out when these tests were passing, then figure out what change/s
>>>>> caused
>>>>> the failures. It could be the reduced amount of synchronization
>>>>> time in
>>>>> TaskManager, but I'm only guessing.
>>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>> [java] # of tests started = 40
>>>>> [java] # of tests completed = 40
>>>>> [java] # of tests passed = 30
>>>>> [java] # of tests failed = 10
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Presumably, the errors were (re)introduced after build.xml or
>>>> something was changed to drop the servicediscovery tests. It may be
>>>> easier to bound the time frame by looking for that change.
>>>>
>>>> Could you also do a review to find out whether there are any other
>>>> tests that are not being run? It definitely needs to be done, and you
>>>> are much more familiar with the test set-up than I am. If you don't
>>>> have time, I'll try.
>>>>
>>>> Patricia
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message