river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au>
Subject Re: ServiceDiscoveryManager test coverage
Date Sun, 22 Aug 2010 01:00:20 GMT
I'm probably not going to find time to run the tests for about a week, 
however we should probably start back at the last release and confirm 
that runs as expected first.

Peter Firmstone wrote:
> I'm aware that some of the tests that aren't being run are known 
> failures due to the missing Kerberos Key Server and Squid Proxy 
> server.  I had one zone set up on apache zones for the KDC, however I 
> haven't set that up.  I'm not sure if the same zone can be used for 
> the Kerberos Key server and the Proxy, or if we need a new proxy 
> server zone too.
> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>> On 8/21/2010 3:43 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>> ...
>>> This is unfortunate, to solve it, I'll to have to go back in time & 
>>> find
>>> out when these tests were passing, then figure out what change/s caused
>>> the failures. It could be the reduced amount of synchronization time in
>>> TaskManager, but I'm only guessing.
>> ...
>>>     [java] # of tests started   = 40
>>>     [java] # of tests completed = 40
>>>     [java] # of tests passed    = 30
>>>     [java] # of tests failed    = 10
>> Presumably, the errors were (re)introduced after build.xml or 
>> something was changed to drop the servicediscovery tests. It may be 
>> easier to bound the time frame by looking for that change.
>> Could you also do a review to find out whether there are any other 
>> tests that are not being run? It definitely needs to be done, and you 
>> are much more familiar with the test set-up than I am. If you don't 
>> have time, I'll try.
>> Patricia

View raw message