river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org>
Subject Re: TaskManager progress
Date Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:29:53 GMT
A re-run with a build.properties only got 9 failures. Here is the first 
example:

      [java] 
com/sun/jini/test/spec/loader/pref/preferredClassLoader/GetPermissionsSecurityException.td
      [java] Test Failed: Test Failed: 
com.sun.jini.qa.harness.TestException:
      [java] 
Class.forName(com.sun.jini.test.spec.loader.util.classes.Class01, false, 
loader)
      [java]   returned:class 
com.sun.jini.test.spec.loader.util.classes.Class01
      [java]   expected:throws SecurityException

The complaint seems to be a failure to throw an expected 
SecurityException. Any ideas?

Thanks,

Patricia



On 8/8/2010 9:27 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> I have installed Ubuntu in a VirtualBox, and built using the same files,
> except for renaming build.properties to get it out of the way for now.
> The build was successful. I got 13 QA test failures, for example:
>
> [java] com/sun/jini/test/spec/jrmp/jrmpexporter/Unexport_BehaviorTest4.td
> [java] Test Failed: Test Failed with an Unexpected Exception:
> java.rmi.server.ExportException: Port already in use: 5678; nested
> exception is:
> [java] java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>
> [java] # of tests started = 397
> [java] # of tests completed = 397
> [java] # of tests skipped = 18
> [java] # of tests passed = 384
> [java] # of tests failed = 13
>
> This means my really weird problems are definitely related to windows
> issues, not svn.
>
> Patricia
>
>
> On 8/5/2010 3:24 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>> Ok, strange, I'll do the same, see if it's something wrong with the
>> apache svn.
>>
>> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>> I attached this to the wrong message. It is actually a reply to the
>>> suggestion to checkout into a new directory.
>>>
>>> On 8/4/2010 9:51 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>>> Done. It still fails, which makes no sense at all to me. I've uploaded
>>>> build.properties (the only file involved that is not the result of the
>>>> checkout) and the output:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.patriciashanahan.com/apache/build.properties
>>>> http://www.patriciashanahan.com/apache/myBuildLog.txt
>>>>
>>>> Patricia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/2/2010 12:10 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>>>>> Try running ant all.clean again, then look at build/deps, it should be
>>>>> empty.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps ant all.clean isn't cleaning everything in your case?
>>>>>
>>>>> Peter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>>>>> Here it is, but it does not make sense to me. As far as I can tell,
>>>>>> RevokeablePolicy is only mentioned in comments and build reports.
I
>>>>>> have checked that PreferredClassLoader.class was rebuilt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patricia
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ find . -type f -exec grep 'RevokeablePolicy' '{}' ';' -print
>>>>>> org\apache\river\api\security\RevokeablePolicy.class
>>>>>> ./build/deps/jsk-platform.deps
>>>>>> [java] Warning: Class not found:
>>>>>> org.apache.river.api.security.RevokeablePolicy
>>>>>> [java] Warning: Class not found:
>>>>>> org.apache.river.api.security.RevokeablePolicy
>>>>>> [java] Warning: Class not found:
>>>>>> org.apache.river.api.security.RevokeablePolicy
>>>>>> ./myBuildLog.txt
>>>>>> * RevokeablePolicy, hence the constructor change.
>>>>>> ./src/net/jini/loader/pref/.svn/text-base/PreferredClassLoader.java.svn-base
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * RevokeablePolicy, hence the constructor change.
>>>>>> ./src/net/jini/loader/pref/PreferredClassLoader.java
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/1/2010 3:36 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>>>>>>> Can you run a search for RevokeablePolicy, so I can track down
the
>>>>>>> dependency and fix the files? Sounds like there's a problem on
svn
>>>>>>> somewhere.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>>>>>>> I did that, and get the same results. I get several warnings
during
>>>>>>>> jar building:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jini-ext.jar:
>>>>>>>> [java] Warning: Class not found:
>>>>>>>> org.apache.river.api.security.RevokeablePolicy
>>>>>>>> [jar] Building jar: C:\apache\river\jtsk\trunk\lib\jini-ext.jar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jsk-dl.jar:
>>>>>>>> [jar] Building jar: C:\apache\river\jtsk\trunk\lib-dl\jsk-dl.jar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jsk-lib.jar:
>>>>>>>> [java] Warning: Class not found:
>>>>>>>> org.apache.river.api.security.RevokeablePolicy
>>>>>>>> [jar] Building jar: C:\apache\river\jtsk\trunk\lib\jsk-lib.jar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jsk-resources.jar:
>>>>>>>> [jar] Building jar:
>>>>>>>> C:\apache\river\jtsk\trunk\lib\jsk-resources.jar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jsk-platform.jar:
>>>>>>>> [java] Warning: Class not found:
>>>>>>>> org.apache.river.api.security.RevokeablePolicy
>>>>>>>> [jar] Building jar: C:\apache\river\jtsk\trunk\lib\jsk-platform.jar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> followed by:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>>>>>> C:\apache\river\jtsk\trunk\build.xml:783: The following error
>>>>>>>> occurred
>>>>>>>> while executing this line:
>>>>>>>> C:\apache\river\jtsk\trunk\common.xml:195:
>>>>>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>>>>> org/apache/river/api/security/Denied
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/1/2010 2:54 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>>>>>>>>> RevokeablePolicy shouldn't be there, it was renamed to
>>>>>>>>> RevokeableDynamicPolicy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> can you try ant all.clean and run svn update again?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/2010 3:24 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>> To get all these tests functioning on Windows,
I suggest we
>>>>>>>>>>> attempt
>>>>>>>>>>> using the make build, this might give us some
insight into some
>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>> platform support problems. Try both the qa tests
and the jtreg
>>>>>>>>>>> tests if
>>>>>>>>>>> you can.
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I just tried building the latest revision with "ant
build.all",
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> got failure due to missing classes:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.river.api.security.RevokeablePolicy
>>>>>>>>>> org/apache/river/api/security/Denied
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The .java files for those classes are present, in
the expected
>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>> based on the fully qualified names.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Patricia
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message