Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pats@acm.org designates
 209.86.89.63 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4C50C932.2010107@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:20:02 -0700
From: Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (RIVER-344) com.sun.jini.thread.TaskManager
 scalability
 and concurrency.
References: <31393560.576161280092909343.JavaMail.jira@thor>
 <4C4EBDE5.9050002@zeus.net.au> <4C4EDD07.50109@acm.org>
 <4C4F4B53.6080900@zeus.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <4C4F4B53.6080900@zeus.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've just had a rethink on the patches - I think you need to scan the 
logs for WARNING level messages from TaskManager containing 
"Task.runAfter exception". I just remembered that the current 
implementation turns a throw from TaskManager.Task.runAfter into a 
warning in the log.

Would it be better to log directly, rather than throw? I can produce a 
new patch to do that, maybe at the ERROR level to make sure it will be 
noticed?

Patricia


On 7/27/2010 2:10 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
> QA Test Results:
> [java] -----------------------------------------
> [java]
> [java] # of tests started = 397
> [java] # of tests completed = 397
> [java] # of tests skipped = 18
> [java] # of tests passed = 397
> [java] # of tests failed = 0
> [java]
> [java] -----------------------------------------
> [java]
> [java] Date finished:
> [java] Wed Jul 28 00:12:51 EST 2010
> [java] Time elapsed:
> [java] 11686 seconds
>
>
> Timezone GMT +10 (Australia)
>
> Jtreg tests to follow.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter.
>
> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>> Please let me know if and when you have looked at the patch, and if
>> there are any problems with it, because I'm working on more, similar,
>> tests.
>>
>> Also, what is your time zone? It affects the meaning of "tomorrow".
>> I'm in California.
>>
>> Patricia
>>
>>
>> Peter Firmstone wrote:
>>> I'll have the results of the tests tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Peter.
>>>
>>> Patricia Shanahan (JIRA) wrote:
>>>> [
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>>>> ]
>>>>
>>>> Patricia Shanahan updated RIVER-344:
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Attachment: first_test.patch
>>>>
>>>> This is the first in a series of test patches for probing behavior
>>>> of TaskManager users. Feel free to change the RuntimeException throw
>>>> to anything you prefer that will be easily recognized during testing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> com.sun.jini.thread.TaskManager scalability and concurrency.
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Key: RIVER-344
>>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-344
>>>>> Project: River
>>>>> Issue Type: Sub-task
>>>>> Components: com_sun_jini_thread
>>>>> Environment: All
>>>>> Reporter: Peter Firmstone
>>>>> Attachments: first_test.patch
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The current implementation of TaskManger doesn't scale.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>