river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Hobbs <tvho...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: ServiceRegistrar
Date Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:11:02 GMT
Does this not hook into the security discussions on internet-visible

You can satisfy your use case with authorisation levels and just not give
"everyone" the authority to register services.  To my mind, this seems
cleaner (although not necessarily better or easier), than having two breeds
of ServiceRegistrar.

Just a thought.


On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Peter Firmstone <jini@zeus.net.au> wrote:

> For a ServiceRegistrar implementation where you don't want to register
> Services (A static ServiceRegistrar used only for lookup) would returning a
> null ServiceRegistration suffice?  Or is this fraught with danger, has
> anyone ever tried it?
> Use case:  You've got an internet facing Registrar and you don't want
> external Services to register.
> Cheers,
> Peter.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message