Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: Apache River Release
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:15:10 -0000
Message-ID: <964EAC824495234A86F3C47DA8BD8AAD177780@sucden-exch.sucden.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4B1B7C32.4040505@zeus.net.au>
Thread-Topic: Apache River Release
Thread-Index: Acp2WUphB/0LGOMPSeKIm7wQZ8gSkQXwIdaw
References: <4B1B7C32.4040505@zeus.net.au>
From: "Tom Hobbs" <tom.hobbs@sucfin.com>
To: <river-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="MCBoundary=_110010517151101202"

--MCBoundary=_110010517151101202
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I figured most of the core information is the same, so all I've done is
a bit of tidying up..

 - Replaced all* references to "Jini" with "River"
 - Updated the version numbers in the html files in doc/

(*) With the exception of file/path/package names and references such as
"previously the Jini project donated from Sun" etc.

Changed the release notes details to be "None since 2.1.1" for the
following;

 - activate.html
 - browser.html
 - classserver.html
 - comsunjinithread.html
 - discovery.html
 - fiddler.html
 - jeri.html
 - join.html
 - lease.html
 - loader.html
 - mahalo.html
 - mercury.html
 - netjinientry.html
 - norm.html
 - outrigger.html
 - reggie.html
 - security.html
 - servicediscovery.html
 - servicestarter.html

I know that ClassDep has changed, so I've left
release-notes/classdep.html alone because I don't know the details of
the change.

That's a bit worrying, according to SVN there haven't been any changes
of note to these files so either they are very out of date or
development really hasn't happened. =20

As far as I can see, changes still need to be made to;

 - release-notes/bugfixes.html
 - release-notes/new.html
 - Any new development needs to have its details put into these notes

Lastly, I asked a while ago but didn't seem to get a reply.  I noticed
that the Javadoc on the Apache River site are missing some packages most
obviously all the com.sun packages, but also some others e.g.
net.jini.admin, net.jini.core.discovery and a few others. =20

Is this intentional?  Have classes just moved packages?  Am I missing
something?  Can this get fixed for the AR2 release?

I'm prepared to accept that I've made changes where I shouldn't have,
but if someone can let me know where they are I can back the changes
out.

Sorry I couldn't help more,

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Firmstone [mailto:jini@zeus.net.au]=20
Sent: 06 December 2009 09:41
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Apache River Release

Hi,

Could anyone / everyone, willing to help, go over the current trunk=20
documentation and check for out of date information etc and assist where

possible (raise issue, submit patch) to update for the Apache 2.2.0
release?

Don't worry about the qa or test docs yet, just the main build.

Regards,

Peter.

www.sucdenfinancial.com

Sucden Financial Limited, Plantation Place South, 60 Great Tower Street, Lo=
ndon EC3R 5AZ
Telephone +44 203 207 5000

Registered in England no. 1095841
VAT registration no. GB 446 9061 33

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and ente=
red in the FSA register under no. 114239

This email, including any files transmitted with it, is confidential and ma=
y be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recip=
ient. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify =
postmaster@sucfin.com immediately and delete it from your computer system.

We believe, but do not warrant, that this email and its attachments are vir=
us-free, but you should check.

Sucden Financial Limited may monitor traffic data of both business and pers=
onal emails. By replying to this email, you consent to Sucden Financial 's =
monitoring the content of any emails you send to or receive from Sucden Fin=
ancial . Sucden Financial is not liable for any opinions expressed by the s=
ender where this is a non-business email.

The contents of this e-mail do not constitute advice and should not be rega=
rded as a recommendation to buy, sell or otherwise deal with any particular=
 investment.

This message has been scanned for viruses by Mimecast.
--MCBoundary=_110010517151101202--