river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au>
Subject Re: Apache River Release - Voting Period
Date Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:28:36 GMT
Thanks Jukka,

If all the source *.java and *.html files contain the library headers 
will this be sufficient?

Don't really want to edit all the *.td or policy files.



          Which Files Must Contain An ASF License Text?

Every source file must contain the appropriate ASF License text.

          Is A Full Copy Of The License Required In Each Source File?

In short, only one copy of the license is needed per distribution. This 
full license file should be placed at the root of the distribution in a 
file named LICENSE. For software developed at the ASF, each source file 
need only contain the boilerplate notice 

Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Peter Firmstone <jini@zeus.net.au> wrote:
>> Does the following mean I shouldn't include the qa or test directory's
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
>>         How Do The Types Of Apache Software Distribution Differ?
>>   * *Test Packages* are not Apache releases. All releases require due
>>     process and official approval. Test packages are for testing
>>     ongoing development and should only be discussed on the project
>>     development lists.
> This refers to things like nightly snapshots that are made available
> for people to test the latest code in the trunk.
> BR,
> Jukka Zitting

View raw message