river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au>
Subject Re: Apache River Release - Voting Period
Date Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:58:31 GMT
I noticed there are some issues with qa in the RAT report.

Does the following mean I shouldn't include the qa or test directory's 

          How Do The Types Of Apache Software Distribution Differ?

    * *Test Packages* are not Apache releases. All releases require due
      process and official approval. Test packages are for testing
      ongoing development and should only be discussed on the project
      development lists.

I've also just updated the release artifacts at:


Including the RAT reports.



Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Niclas,
> On Jan 30, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> I'll run apache RAT shortly, so these might be updated tomorrow, if 
>>> I find
>>> any problems, however feel free to do your own auditing.
>> RAT is normally run before announcing the availability and placed
>> alongside the artifacts to be released.
> Beg pardon, but RAT is normally run before the vote is conducted so 
> the voters can see the RAT output before they review the release.
> Craig
> Craig L Russell
> Assistant Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair, OpenJPA PMC
> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo

View raw message