river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Grahn <jgr...@simulexinc.com>
Subject Re: language level?
Date Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:55:22 GMT
1.5 was the consensus.   If you want 1.6 (due to features, fixes, or 
performance), you're free to make the case for it.

Peter Firmstone's tally as we were discussing it:
--------
Those in favour of using Java 6 features:

Jeremy Easton-Marks
Greg Wonderly
James Grahn

Those in favour of using Java 5 features:

Dennis Reedy
Jim Waldo
Jonathan Costers
Greg Trasuk
Niclas Hedhman
Dan Rollo
Greg Wonderly
Jukka Zitting
Sean Landis
Peter Firmstone
James Grahn


Those who would like to see continued support for  JRE 1.4 (bytecode
only, using Retrotranslator):

Patrick Wright
Wade Chandler
Peter Firmstone
--------

jamesG

Zsolt Kúti wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I can not find a mail archive search function, that's why this question
> is here: has there been a consensus about what level is targeted with
> development? 1.5 or 1.6?
> 
> Thanks
> Zsolt
> 

Mime
View raw message