Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43088 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2009 04:40:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2009 04:40:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 49434 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 04:41:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49367 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 04:41:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list river-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49357 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2009 04:41:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:41:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [61.9.189.149] (HELO nschwmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com) (61.9.189.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:40:54 +0000 Received: from nschwotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com ([61.9.223.241]) by nschwmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090704044029.YQKT1928.nschwmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 04:40:29 +0000 Received: from [10.1.1.2] (really [61.9.223.241]) by nschwotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090704044028.RAMN8167.nschwotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com@[10.1.1.2]> for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 04:40:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4A4EDD74.3010400@zeus.net.au> Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:41:24 +1000 From: Peter Firmstone User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080531) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Was: OSGi and Jini] Now -> Next Steps References: <4A44EBA3.8030707@wonderly.org> <0CC21688-E720-40BB-8237-D47B4DEE4F48@wonderly.org> <4A4921FA.3030408@wonderly.org> <510143ac0907030226i22b4d6e9tf70857d357f115f4@mail.gmail.com> <30B045EF-D11D-4AB6-988E-3F97CAE8419B@gmail.com> <4A4EA0AD.4080807@zeus.net.au> <93890df00907031726k22aa0b50ib2306c2ef304c6ea@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <93890df00907031726k22aa0b50ib2306c2ef304c6ea@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150205.4A4EDD3D.0057,ss=1,fgs=0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Elijah, To test HTTP proxy support for the net.jini.jeri.http transport implementation. It's listed under JIRA as issue RIVER-306 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-306 Sun originally had a Squid http proxy server on their network, it's hostname was jiniproxy, it's hardcoded into one of the jtreg tests; net/jini/jeri/http/echo/EchoImpl.java I want to have all tests running before releasing AR2. In order to stimulate a more agile development model, were trying to make the integration test suite and the jtreg unit and regression tests more developer friendly (easier to setup and run using ant). The junit test framework has also been adopted recently. Once testing is working properly, I'd like to look at the implementation of jini over http networks based on the work that Mark Brouwer did in the Seven project. He made a presentation at JCM10, the slides for which are still available. If you want to check the Seven project out, add the following to your Internet host table (/etc/hosts) as DNS lookup no longer works: 62.177.181.217 www.cheiron.org scm.cheiron.org issue.cheiron.org After that I'd like to play around with NIO and DEFLATE compression for serialization and http classserver performance improvements. I recently stumbled across a complete Java implementation of Kerberos Server and client software, I'm thinking there may be benefits for River running with a default authorisation setup, however it's GPL2, so I'd have to ask if it can be relicensed first. Cheers, Peter. Elijah Menifee wrote: > What roll does the Squid proxy on Sun's network play on > building/testing/releasing AR2? > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote: > > >> That's almost the plan, just want to get all the tests right first and a >> couple of tweaks to the build then release. It's almost ready, I've just >> been very busy and haven't gotten onto it yet. Not much work left though. >> >> On that subject, I'm having some trouble deciding on a solution to replace >> the Squid proxy server that was present on Sun's network? Any ideas? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Peter. >> >> > >