river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Elijah Menifee <elijahcmeni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Was: OSGi and Jini] Now -> Next Steps
Date Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:14:49 GMT
Thinking more about it I might be wrong about this (once again IANAL)...
That compatibly might mean if they upgraded to GPLv3 they could link to the
River stuff without breaking their GPL license, but it may not be reciprocal
allowing Appach stuff to link to it without converting to GPLv3....


>
> P.S. According to the FSF GPLv3 is license compatible with the v2 Apache
> License, so if the Kerberos stuff can be upgraded to GPLv3 ( sometimes the
> license on software states or a later version..., or if they choose to
> relicense it under GPLv3) it should be compatable.
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Peter Firmstone <jini@zeus.net.au> wrote:
> ...
>
>> After that I'd like to play around with NIO and DEFLATE compression for
>> serialization and http classserver performance improvements.
>>
>> I recently stumbled across a complete Java implementation of Kerberos
>> Server and client software, I'm thinking there may be benefits for River
>> running with a default authorisation setup, however it's GPL2, so I'd have
>> to ask if it can be relicensed first.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message