river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Costers <jonathan.cost...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk #163
Date Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:28:25 GMT
Thanks Jukka

The build seems to work again:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/River-trunk/168/

This brings up something else: will we include the QA harness and test
binaries in the River distribution?
Currently, I added them to the main River release bundle, but I'm not sure
if we should do that.

Options:
- include QA binaries in main binary River release (makes the bundle become
much larger)
- create a separate binary QA release, something like
apache-river-qa-2.1.x-bin.zip next to apache-river-2.1.x-bin.zip
- do not release QA binaries at all, only include QA harness and test code
in the source release

The same question could be asked about the "hello example", which is
currently not released as part of the binary bundle.

Rationale:
- Most people just using the River libraries probably usually don't care too
much about running the QA tests (it should be done by the River
contributors)
- Releasing the QA binaries and adding a way to run them standalone (outside
Ant) would maybe increase the number of times the tests are being run, which
would benefit issue detection

Team, your thoughts?

Best
Jonathan

2009/4/20 Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Jonathan Costers
> <jonathan.costers@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > OK, here is what I think we should use for now:
> >
> > cd $WORKSPACE/jtsk/trunk
> > ant all.clean release qa.run
>
> OK, done.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message