river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au>
Subject Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk #163
Date Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:48:37 GMT
I vote option 2

- create a separate binary QA release, something like
apache-river-qa-2.1.x-bin.zip next to apache-river-2.1.x-bin.zip

If someone has problems on an untested platform (we probably can't test 
all environments) a user can run the QA tests.

Cheers,

Peter Firmstone.


Jonathan Costers wrote:
> Thanks Jukka
>
> The build seems to work again:
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/River-trunk/168/
>
> This brings up something else: will we include the QA harness and test
> binaries in the River distribution?
> Currently, I added them to the main River release bundle, but I'm not sure
> if we should do that.
>
> Options:
> - include QA binaries in main binary River release (makes the bundle become
> much larger)
> - create a separate binary QA release, something like
> apache-river-qa-2.1.x-bin.zip next to apache-river-2.1.x-bin.zip
> - do not release QA binaries at all, only include QA harness and test code
> in the source release
>
> The same question could be asked about the "hello example", which is
> currently not released as part of the binary bundle.
>
> Rationale:
> - Most people just using the River libraries probably usually don't care too
> much about running the QA tests (it should be done by the River
> contributors)
> - Releasing the QA binaries and adding a way to run them standalone (outside
> Ant) would maybe increase the number of times the tests are being run, which
> would benefit issue detection
>
> Team, your thoughts?
>
> Best
> Jonathan
>
> 2009/4/20 Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
>
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Jonathan Costers
>> <jonathan.costers@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> OK, here is what I think we should use for now:
>>>
>>> cd $WORKSPACE/jtsk/trunk
>>> ant all.clean release qa.run
>>>       
>> OK, done.
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>>     
>
>   


Mime
View raw message