river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tom Hobbs" <tom.ho...@sucfin.com>
Subject RE: Deciding the Future
Date Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:23:13 GMT
I currently have a local version whereby I created a source directory
inside of the River code and am gradually moving all the code out of the
test project into this new source directory.

I'm also changing how the tests are executed by shoe-horning them into
JUnit TestCases.

The biggest challenge I'm facing is retaining all the customisation that
the current test harness allows and trying to keep the tests running

I've made some changes to the harness code which is largely limited to
altering the packages and associated class/constructor/method access
modifiers to support the new structure.

My goal is, in the next few weeks, to have moved all the
TransactionManager tests over to this approach.  Then I'll post a patch
to show the changes which I would welcome feedback on.  Then, I hope,
it'll be a case of mostly cut-and-pasting the rest of the tests over.

I believe that once this work is done further subdividing the
packages/sources and changing the build tool (or not) will be much
simpler - although I am open to correction.



-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Trasuk [mailto:trasukg@stratuscom.com] 
Sent: 08 December 2008 11:58
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Deciding the Future

This reminds me of that quote - "Some people, when confronted with a
problem, think 'I know, I?ll use regular expressions.' Now they have two

I'm not in favour of Maven.  I can see restructuring the build somewhat
for Ant (remember, the structure really comes from being built with a
makefile, before there was an Ant).



On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 03:44, Jools wrote:
> +1
> I've love to see the codebase move over to a maven build.
> Over the last 9 months we have moved all our projects over to maven,
> great success.
> Our build and release procedures are greatly reduced, and getting
> up and running with their ide's.
> I'd be happy to Log a JIRA and take a lead on this, what do others
think ?
> --Jools
> 2008/12/8 Jeff Ramsdale <jeff.ramsdale@gmail.com>
> > Niclas,
> > Once again I very much agree with you. Dan's got a good point about
> > jars
> > (-dl and non-dl) resulting from each service component, though.
> >
> > I know this will induce groans from some parties but Apache River
> > really benefit from a Maven build. The dependencies between modules
> > complex as is the generation of the artifacts. Maven would allow for
> > restructuring that clarifies the source structure while supporting
> > generation of composite artifacts. You might look into the Maven
> > Plugin that Chris Sterling introduced several years ago: <
> > https://maven-classdep-plugin.dev.java.net/>. It could make sense to
> > this plugin into the Apache River fold, incidentally. Use of this
> > could also help increase uptake among the Maven developer crowd as
> > simplifies the generation of artifacts for Jini services.
> >
> > A huge benefit of a Maven-based build is the ability to generate
> > for most of the popular IDEs. This has proven to be incredibly
useful on my
> > teams and allows for a multiplicity of IDEs to be used against the
> > codebase.
> >
> >
Greg Trasuk, President
StratusCom Manufacturing Systems Inc. - We use information technology to
solve business problems on your plant floor.

Sucden (UK) Limited, 5 London Bridge Street, London SE1 9SG
Telephone +44 20 7940 9400
Registered in England no. 1095841
VAT registration no. GB 446 9061 33
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and entered in the FSA
register under no. 114239

This email, including any files transmitted with it, is confidential and may be privileged.
It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, please notify postmaster@sucden.co.uk immediately and delete it
from your computer system.

We believe, but do not warrant, that this email and its attachments are virus-free, but you
should check. 

Sucden (UK) Ltd may monitor traffic data of both business and personal emails. By replying
to this email, you consent to Sucden’s monitoring the content of any emails you send to
or receive from Sucden. Sucden is not liable for any opinions expressed by the sender where
this is a non-business email.
The contents of this e-mail do not constitute advice and should not be regarded as a recommendation
to buy, sell or otherwise deal with any particular investment.
This message has been scanned for viruses by Mimecast.
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message