river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sam Chance" <sgcha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Future of Jini/River
Date Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:53:37 GMT
Wade, et al,

Jeremy seemed to do a good job of compiling a structured way ahead.  I could
be wrong, but I recall no significant response to his idea. I recommend
rallying around Jeremy and implementing his idea.

Sam

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Wade Chandler <
hwadechandler-apache@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Where are we? I am very interested in contributing more towards that 3.0
> release or what ever...where it really becomes River and things start anew
> in a sense. I have some NetBeans things I *must* attend to in the near term,
> but certainly would love to help with tooling for NB and some other things.
> What needs to happen for the next release for those bugs which are fixed or
> being fixed to be released as essentially the last bits of incubator
> releases and working towards the main goals of this past conversation?
> Trying to keep the interest moving, but I also have some applications I'll
> be using Jini in the near term :-D
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wade
>
>  ==================
> Wade Chandler, CCE
> Software Engineer and Developer, Certified Forensic Computer Examiner,
> NetBeans Dream Team Member, and NetBeans Board Member
> http://www.certified-computer-examiner.com
> http://wiki.netbeans.org/wiki/view/NetBeansDreamTeam
> http://www.netbeans.org
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Calum Shaw-Mackay <calum.shawmackay@gmail.com>
> > To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:47:43 AM
> > Subject: Re: Future of Jini/River
> >
> > Niclas -
> >
> > Can you please elaborate on this? I 'd just like to know, I've been
> > working with DI concepts using Jini configuration, as well as
> > dynamic,event-based reconfiguration through Thor?
> >
> > Just wondering if this is within the scope that you're thinking of
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Calum
> >
> >
> > > * Configuration System. Although I like it in principle (after all I
> > > was in the JSR-78 EG where it came to light in the first place), BUT
> > > it needs better adjustment to agile and TDD methodologies. Perhaps it
> > > is only a documentation issue, but I have been faced with using
> > > filesystem files to get things going. InputStreams are the way to go.
>
>


-- 
Sam Chance
443-694-5293 (m)
410-694-0240 x108 (o)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message