Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 48723 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2008 21:17:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2008 21:17:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 47206 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2008 21:17:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47180 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2008 21:17:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list river-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47143 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2008 21:17:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:17:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.98.34] (HELO brmea-mail-3.sun.com) (192.18.98.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:16:27 +0000 Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m26LGlmm007980 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 21:16:47 GMT Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JXB00J01T1U2K00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Thomas.Johnson@Sun.COM) for river-dev@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:16:47 -0700 (MST) Received: from [129.148.70.228] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JXB004WLV3CJXC0@mail-amer.sun.com> for river-dev@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:16:25 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:16:24 -0500 From: Thomas Vinod Johnson Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (RIVER-226) LLD: consider delaying the queuing of a discovery request immediately after a discard In-reply-to: <47D05061.7020302@cheiron.org> Sender: Thomas.Johnson@Sun.COM To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-id: <47D05F28.1080808@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <1169540418.1204755220609.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <47D05061.7020302@cheiron.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070802) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Mark Brouwer wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Patch looks good however I wonder why you decided to start with a > delay of 20 seconds (due to the index of 2) versus removing the first > 2 entries in the sleepTime array? Not Thanks. > that it really matters much ... Not sure I follow. The sleepTime array's values (including the first two) could continue still be used for the back off in the case that initial discovery fails. As for using 20 seconds, that was somewhat arbitrary.