river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Questions
Date Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:37:33 GMT
Hi Mark,

On Feb 2, 2008, at 3:16 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:

> Hi all,
> I recently mentioned that it might be confusing for people what part  
> of
> the svn tree they have to pick (due to the reorganization). Well that
> confusing already arose. What shall we do? delete river/trunk or is
> there another way to make it invisible?

You could make river/trunk contain a README file that explains why the  
obvious choice isn't the right one.

You have checked out the river/trunk module, and probably didn't  
realize that there's nothing here. The river community has decided to  
split river into two parts.

At river/jtsk/trunk you can find the part of the river project that  
deals with ...

> Another thing I bumped into, it appears that I edited the Confluence
> Wiki to show the right svn location to utilize by people who want to
> grap the source but again these changes didn't propagate to the River
> generated website. This is Confluence
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/RIVER/Source+Code and  
> this is
> the River site http://incubator.apache.org/river/RIVER/source- 
> code.html
> So it looks like changes in some pages propagate, while others don't  
> (I
> think the Confluence inclusion mechanism is causing this). Is there  
> a solution to this, or a way I can trigger generation of the whole  
> website (I think I need admin rights for that).
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Mark

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

View raw message