river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Branching Strategy River
Date Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:35:02 GMT
Hi Mark,

On Jan 20, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Mark Brouwer wrote:

> Bob Scheifler wrote:
>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>> What was the rationale for creating multiple trunks?
>> I think jtsk and qatest are likely to evolve at different paces,
>> with somewhat different release timelines.  I think allowing
>> independent releases of them will be useful.
>> - Bob
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to perform the following branch actions in svn before
> committing work, before doing so I would like to ask whether there  
> is a
> problem with that, or that I have to do something else before  
> proceeding.
>
> 1. /river/trunk/jtsk into /river/jtsk/trunk
> 2. /river/trunk/qatests into /river/qatests/trunk
> 3. /river/jtsk/trunk into /river/jtsk/branches/2.1
> 4. /river/jtsk/branches/2.1 into /river/jtsk/tags/2.1.1
>
> Another thing we have to consider is whether we expect the next  
> release
> to be a maintenance release 2.1.x or a feature release 2.2 for reasons
> to decide on which branch to commit our work. My preference would be  
> to
> go for 2.2.

The policy in many projects is to put new features into trunk (2.2)  
and bug fixes into both trunk and active branches (2.1).

Craig
>
> -- 
> Mark

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message