Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:29:58 -0500
From: Jim Hurley <Jim.Hurley@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: building an AR1 release candidate...
In-reply-to: <7FCE72F1-89B9-490A-9D18-22E103B476A7@mac.com>
Sender: Jim.Hurley@Sun.COM
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-id: <7DD21B3A-EA92-4988-84EB-9B76D85FE12A@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <8B811908-651A-4DAC-8B61-5D073708D83E@sun.com>
 <65ED8EE2-D04A-4A90-8289-8CA72C0551E6@sun.com>
 <08C7FFED-AAE9-446E-BD03-831CE6CE7869@sun.com>
 <C30FDB1A-579A-45E5-96BB-A4C976408246@sun.com>
 <67099BB4-07E5-4B00-A34D-9976B8270FEC@sun.com>
 <7CB50F8D-837C-4C47-9520-C028BA0BD07E@mac.com>
 <CF9EE1C6-2C9D-4858-9A16-8098A163CF31@sun.com>
 <7FCE72F1-89B9-490A-9D18-22E103B476A7@mac.com>

Awesome, thanks Nige.

It seems like Hudson will/may be our longer term solution, but I'm  
guessing
that will all take a bit to setup.  In trying to push AR1 the last  
few steps
to release... I'd like to try to modify (the build targets) of the  
current
Continuum build to include building the zip bundles.  That only works if
there's an archive area from Continuum to access the built zip bundles.
Phil?  Someone?  Can you help here?

If that's not going to work, we'll have to drop back and just the build
candidates on someone's machine and make them available.

-Jim


On Nov 8, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> I have asked on infrastructure@apache.org if we can get access to a  
> box to setup a Hudson instance.  Another incubator project I'm  
> involved with also wants to use Hudson.
>
> Nige
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>>> Sorry, no.  I use Hudson...much easier to configure IMO.
>>> http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/
>>
>> I'm appreciative of Phil setting up the Continuum process for us,  
>> but is
>> using Hudson a better/preferred option for our project?  Nigel, would
>> you be interested in helping with that?
>>
>> Or is that discouraged as Continuum is an Apache project and Hudson
>> is not?  Don't want to open a can of worms here but want to have  
>> something
>> the Community can support.
>>
>> -Jim
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
>>>> Phil?  Nigel?  Anyone with Continuum experience that can help here?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Frank Barnaby wrote:
>>>> :
>>>>> I'm sorry if I mislead you.  I'm not averse to modifying the  
>>>>> Continuum
>>>>> process, and I do indeed have the appropriate account  
>>>>> permissions to do
>>>>> so.  At the moment, however, I just lack experience with  
>>>>> Continuum.  I
>>>>> just wanted to know if anyone could provide a quick answer  
>>>>> before I start
>>>>> digging deeper.  I also didn't want to assume that I own it, so  
>>>>> I left it
>>>>> as an unassigned issue on the table.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>