Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of calum.shawmackay@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.190 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=gxp5M4B2A6EIG3cjD1qs1xmmm8PKk43aDQ2zQYwWrZtfZP+hNqnVrOCiODO+CSpDIWiX0+yJOb9x+FZs1cz9Dyke/fcLGRzTktfwJlr6omVZE4tq17lIid99bUszriiYw2FEv4uFD7u1K55Z+e0/Tp+b+ncxLOvY0lGYVKj3xeg=
Message-ID: <4aa658780711220253x454483cdg5dda4f0c5734be9f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:53:20 +0000
From: "Calum Shaw-Mackay" <calum.shawmackay@gmail.com>
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: AR2 initial planning
In-Reply-To: <FA2319EE-3A52-4232-821D-BC69BDA646AB@SUN.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <B49F74DD-BF18-4587-9259-806D80CDDD16@sun.com>
	 <87278C22-DBF1-4E43-89FD-E58602F04BF4@SUN.com>
	 <63776689-5F85-4EA1-AA33-6FE32DEDD1A2@sun.com>
	 <FA2319EE-3A52-4232-821D-BC69BDA646AB@SUN.com>

Given that ServiceUI is now in the core release, I'd like to see the
supplied ServiceBrowser enhanced to give ServiceUI finctionality

Thanks

--Calum
On 19/11/2007, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Jim Hurley wrote:
>
> > On Nov 19, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> >> :
> >> You might consider using JIRA for developers to both assign the
> >> issue to themselves as well as to update the fix version to AR2.
> >> The principle (do-ocracy) is that if you really want something
> >> fixed for a particular release, you'll sign up for it. JIRA will
> >> automatically send your update to the dev list.
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification, Craig.  That is what I had in mind
> > (but didn't
> > articulate too well). I then thought that if someone had a concern
> > with a particular
> > enhancement/bug fix that someone had updated to be fixed in AR2,
> > they could
> > raise it for discussion and if it was decided not to change (for
> > AR2), the fix version
> > could be updated.
>
> +1
>
> Craig
> >
> > -Jim
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>