Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:16:31 -0500
From: Thomas Vinod Johnson <Thomas.Johnson@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Discovery for AR2
In-reply-to: <4744B42D.20705@cheiron.org>
Sender: Thomas.Johnson@Sun.COM
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-id: <474AF15F.20604@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <4744B42D.20705@cheiron.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915)

Mark Brouwer wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> I noticed you scheduled a lot of discovery related work for AR2, I think
> we should coordinate those activities because I believe a lot of them
> might be covered by the same codebase related to the 'discovery kernel'
This particular change is part of a separate branch altogether, so if 
people feel it would be useful it would have to be merged in separately 
(or as part of accepting your modifications)
> you wrote and I customized since then [1] and other modifications
> related to discovery I have made since. Is that work already done in the
> Sun branch that is beyond what is currently released or do you have to
> start that work yet.
>
> I'm about to merge the current changes (JTSK naming) and license header
> changes into my own codebase before being able to merge them back to
> River with my changes, but before doing that I really would like to hear
> of the other committers about when we should branch because this is
> going to be a significant amount of work for me and I don't want to
> start without knowing I can start committing to River soon after that.
>
> [1] I think there is no issue for that one yet, I will create one soon.