river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nigel Daley <nda...@mac.com>
Subject Re: building an AR1 release candidate...
Date Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:52:22 GMT
Ya, I'd help with a Hudson setup.  The fact that Continuum is an  
Apache project is neither here nor there.  Every project is free to  
decide the technologies it uses.

+1 to Hudson as our CI build server.

Nige

On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:

> On Nov 7, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>> Sorry, no.  I use Hudson...much easier to configure IMO.
>> http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/
>
> I'm appreciative of Phil setting up the Continuum process for us,  
> but is
> using Hudson a better/preferred option for our project?  Nigel, would
> you be interested in helping with that?
>
> Or is that discouraged as Continuum is an Apache project and Hudson
> is not?  Don't want to open a can of worms here but want to have  
> something
> the Community can support.
>
> -Jim
>
>
>> On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
>>> Phil?  Nigel?  Anyone with Continuum experience that can help here?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Frank Barnaby wrote:
>>> :
>>>> I'm sorry if I mislead you.  I'm not averse to modifying the  
>>>> Continuum
>>>> process, and I do indeed have the appropriate account  
>>>> permissions to do
>>>> so.  At the moment, however, I just lack experience with  
>>>> Continuum.  I
>>>> just wanted to know if anyone could provide a quick answer  
>>>> before I start
>>>> digging deeper.  I also didn't want to assume that I own it, so  
>>>> I left it
>>>> as an unassigned issue on the table.
>>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message