river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Creswell <...@dcrdev.demon.co.uk>
Subject Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept the Service UI Specification document from Artima, Inc.
Date Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:24:35 GMT
Mark Brouwer wrote:
> Jim Hurley wrote:
>> If folks think that is needed or would be helpful to figure out other
>> svn management issues - that's cool.  I'm not the right person to lead
>> that discussion, so (if it's important) someone should grab the ball
>> and get it started...
> I don't believe it is necessary to draft guidelines with regard to
> branching at this stage, having said that ...

I wonder if we should be keeping an eye on things like Mercurial....


> That brings me to my most important point, what is withholding us from
> branching the current trunk into a release X and we start with the next
> phase where people can work on what they want to work on.

One consideration at least in the future if things go well will be the
issues that Linus has had to confront.  The desire for most to work on
new and cool stuff rather than support or help with the process of a

View raw message