Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 19598 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2007 17:34:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2007 17:34:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 81139 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2007 17:02:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-river-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81128 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2007 17:02:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list river-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81115 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2007 17:02:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:02:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.98.36] (HELO brmea-mail-4.sun.com) (192.18.98.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:02:12 +0000 Received: from fe-amer-10.sun.com ([192.18.109.80]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l9AH1fum025606 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:01:41 GMT Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JPP00G01F8EB300@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Bob.Scheifler@Sun.COM) for river-dev@incubator.apache.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:01:41 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [129.148.70.124] by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JPP00E2ZGMPG190@mail-amer.sun.com> for river-dev@incubator.apache.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:01:37 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:01:36 -0400 From: Bob Scheifler Subject: Re: Build file question In-reply-to: <470C0E5A.1090305@cheiron.org> Sender: Bob.Scheifler@Sun.COM To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org Reply-to: Bob.Scheifler@Sun.COM Message-id: <470D0570.6050102@Sun.COM> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <470B7358.3020404@cheiron.org> <470BF1E2.1030003@Sun.COM> <470C0E5A.1090305@cheiron.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070622) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Mark Brouwer wrote: > If you think we should decide upon the file mask for each and > every file please raise an issue I'd expect uniform write and read permissions across all files, which is why I found the question just about scripts odd. - Bob