river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Hurley <Jim.Hur...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: a potential "AR1" release
Date Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:23:00 GMT
On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Frank Barnaby wrote:
> I've done a test build with the serviceui sources moved into the jtsk
> source tree (namespaces unchanged) and have found no obvious problems.

Thanks Frank.

> One other question comes to mind...  How should we handle the logstore
> portion of the outrigger build?  Should we leave it as is, disable it
> in the build, or remove the sources completely?  If we leave it as is,
> we would need to consider including the prebuilt-outrigger- 
> logstore.jar
> in the source distribution, as Phil suggested, to allow builds without
> the need for a Jini installation.  Disabling the logstore jar'ing
> target, on the other hand, removes the dependency on the Jini binary
> installation but leaves the logstore sources in a unaltered state.
> In all cases, logstore cannot be used without pro.zip (the PSEpro
> runtime library), but persistence is still attainable through the use
> of the snaplogstore implementation.

I'd lean towards what's expedient to get out "AR1" in short order -- but
I do think we're going to have to bite the bullet and probably remove
logstore from the build going forward. It doesn't seem to have long  
term viability.

Other opinions?

-Jim


Mime
View raw message