river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Hurley <Jim.Hur...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: a potential "AR1" release
Date Wed, 29 Aug 2007 03:23:00 GMT
On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Frank Barnaby wrote:
> I've done a test build with the serviceui sources moved into the jtsk
> source tree (namespaces unchanged) and have found no obvious problems.

Thanks Frank.

> One other question comes to mind...  How should we handle the logstore
> portion of the outrigger build?  Should we leave it as is, disable it
> in the build, or remove the sources completely?  If we leave it as is,
> we would need to consider including the prebuilt-outrigger- 
> logstore.jar
> in the source distribution, as Phil suggested, to allow builds without
> the need for a Jini installation.  Disabling the logstore jar'ing
> target, on the other hand, removes the dependency on the Jini binary
> installation but leaves the logstore sources in a unaltered state.
> In all cases, logstore cannot be used without pro.zip (the PSEpro
> runtime library), but persistence is still attainable through the use
> of the snaplogstore implementation.

I'd lean towards what's expedient to get out "AR1" in short order -- but
I do think we're going to have to bite the bullet and probably remove
logstore from the build going forward. It doesn't seem to have long  
term viability.

Other opinions?


View raw message