river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Vinod Johnson <Thomas.John...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: development process
Date Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:50:14 GMT
Mark Brouwer wrote:
> Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
>> Bottom line: I think CTR + a good use of common sense is more than
>> enough. But then again, this is only me and RTC is kosher as well. If
>> you're used to it, I see no reason to change that immediately.
>
> Hi Gianugo,
>
> I see your points and as any process could work depending on the type of
> people and their willingness to make it work, I believe there are 2
> issues not yet mentioned related to the River codebase that make RTC
> IMHO the best choice for the moment.
>
Given the definitions of RTC and CTR (is useful in rapid-prototyping 
environments) in the glossary, I concur that RTC is a better candidate 
for the existing codebase. Moreover, I think starting off with a more 
familiar process helps to ease the transition.


Mime
View raw message