Mailing-List: contact river-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:16:06 -0400
From: Frank Barnaby <Frank.Barnaby@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept the QATests Contribution from Sun Microsystems
In-reply-to: <A45884AF-1C84-4E5D-B39B-EEBECDF8B4C4@sun.com>
Sender: Frank.Barnaby@Sun.COM
To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-id: <127B1939-5358-42E0-817D-5C2A6DD0CB09@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <6111E435-9077-472E-87AB-E9A436122D8E@sun.com>
 <8FFA66A4-D77F-40DA-AA23-E45B1BDA44D7@sun.com>
 <18AD4957-7D3E-45C0-BE92-E2A2F9DF7B88@sun.com>
 <A45884AF-1C84-4E5D-B39B-EEBECDF8B4C4@sun.com>


I uploaded the QA Test sources yesterday afternoon but never saw a  
notification.
The sources did appear to upload fine, though.  The sources reside  
under the
trunk/qatests directory.


Frank


On Jul 2, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Jim Hurley wrote:

> Hi all-
>
> Sorry for the delay -- I was out on vacation last week and
> there was a question on our end that needed to get sorted
> out.
>
> Basically, the question was whether we had submitted the
> best version of the QATests sources to be contributed -- we
> had submitted the latest version from our internal source
> tree (main_latest) vs. the version that was labeled after the
> starter kit v2.1 release went out.  We've gone back to look
> at the deltas and there are about 50 files that were updated
> post the starter kit v2.1 release. There were some test updates,
> but many of the changes were to add hooks for an internal test
> scheduler. Those are basically a noop from running the QATests
> suite perspective - so we're going to go ahead with the integrating
> the contribution as originally submitted.
>
> I apologize again for the misstep -- we'll be getting the QATests
> contribution integrated today.
>
> thanks -Jim
>
>
> On Jun 25, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Frank Barnaby wrote:
>> We have a potential issue regarding the version of the sources in the
>> contribution and are discussing the matter before proceeding with the
>> SVN import.  I apologize for the delay.
>>
>> Frank
>>
>>
>> On Jun 22, 2007, at 1:07 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 17, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Jim Hurley wrote:
>>>> I'd like to call on the Apache River PPMC to vote on
>>>> accepting the QATests contribution from Sun Microsystems
>>>> as submitted in the RIVER-28 Jira issue [1].
>>>> :
>>>> Please vote on accepting the contribution. The vote is open
>>>> for the next 72 hours.  All members and interested parties of the
>>>> Apache River project are encouraged to participate, but only
>>>> votes from the River PPMC members are binding. Like in all
>>>> votes on code changes, a single -1 vote vetoes the motion.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Accept the QATests contribution from Sun
>>>> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-28
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote passes with  15 +1 votes (all from current River
>>> PPMC members) and 1 "0" vote.  The votes were:
>>>
>>> +1  Jim Hurley*
>>> +1  John McClain*
>>> +1  Dan Creswell*
>>> +1  Phil Steitz*
>>> +1  Jim Waldo*
>>> +1  Mark Brouwer*
>>> +1  Brian Murphy*
>>> +1  Jukka Zitting*
>>> +1  Juan Ramirez*
>>> +1  Vinod Johnson*
>>> +1  Bob Scheifler*
>>> +1  Fred Oliver*
>>> +1  Peter Jones*
>>> +1  Frank Barnaby*
>>> +1  Nigel Daley*
>>>
>>> 0    Gianugo Rabellino*
>>>
>>> * - binding vote from PPMC member
>>>
>>> Thanks to all for casting your votes. We're a go --
>>> and now working on getting the code into svn.
>>>
>>> We are going to integrate the code as proposed
>>> (with the jars) and then file a new JIRA issue to
>>> remove the jars and fix the ANT script so that the
>>> jars are buildable from the sources.
>>>
>>> -Jim
>