river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accept the Starter Kit Contribution from Sun Microsystems
Date Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:14:02 GMT
+1

It's ok to bring in source code with the original package name and do  
the rename/move in the Apache repository. Or rename it beforehand,  
your choice.

Just remember to rename it to the official apache names before you  
make a release! ;-)

Craig

On Jun 1, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:

> John McClain - Sun Microsystems, Inc. wrote:
>> Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 5/31/07, Gianugo Rabellino <gianugo@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Before formally stating my +1 (I have no objections), and with a  
>>>> lot
>>>> of excuses from my part given I probably missed that bit, I see  
>>>> that
>>>> no contribution is under an org.apache namespace. Is this the  
>>>> way it
>>>> was agreed to proceed?
>>>
>>> There was some discussion earlier on how to handle the package
>>> namespaces with most of the specifications in net.jini, but some of
>>> the essential parts also in com.sun.jini. I think (didn't pay too  
>>> much
>>> attention at the time, so I might be wrong) the rough consensus  
>>> was to
>>> keep net.jini as the spec namespace and to migrate from com.sun.jini
>>> to org.apache.river by time as the potential backwards compatibility
>>> issues are sorted out. I think it makes sense to bring the code in
>>> as-is and sort out the migration to org.apache before the first
>>> release.
>>
>> This is my memory also
>>
>>
> +1
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message