river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Creswell <...@dcrdev.demon.co.uk>
Subject Re: Responsibilities of the PPMC
Date Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:31:35 GMT
John McClain wrote:
> I think "reasonably high bar for commit to ensure working social and
> technical compatibility, and then faster PMC" is a reasonable place to
> start (understanding that it may well be imposable to change once we
> start....)
> 
> I think "initial committer list == initial PPMC" is fine too.
> 

+1

> Jim Hurley wrote:
>> I am +1 for this position/proposal.  Can others on the list
>> please state your opinion (I think this will be a healthy
>> activity for us).
>>
>> Geir - I am assuming that we're going to make
>> initial committer list == initial PPMC, though.  Cool
>> with that?
>>
>> thanks -Jim
>>
>> On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>> On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My personal taste lately is a reasonably high bar for commit to
>>>>> ensure working social and technical compatibility, and then faster
>>>>> PMC.
>>>>
>>>> Given the nature of the ASF and the high quality and consistency of the
>>>> codebase brought in I'm inclined to go for you personal taste.
>>>>
>>>> In theory it might be possible to come up with a completely different
>>>> process that would be a better fit, but for me it will be a waste of
>>>> time to start thinking of that and why not try something that has
>>>> proven
>>>> itself on a few occasions.
>>>
>>> But note that the bar isn't really that high overall - to me it's
>>> more about social compatibility than technical prowess, because
>>> someone who understands their limits, works well with others, and is
>>> willing to learn is a treasure :)
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>> --Mark
>>
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message